🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are watching closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Trend

In Europe, a increasing chorus of states are considering comparable measures.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' youth". A law may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "one of the options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a bill raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a related step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended families to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a useful foundation," commented a leading parliamentarian behind the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Previously, support built behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have expressed concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to harmful online content argues that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are secure and fit for minors," said a prominent peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, legislation is largely happening at the state level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures mandating parental consent for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to copy this lead, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of the West, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies take a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

Even as this global conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers globally are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.