🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear talks with the United States as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy worked, and disclosed recent overtures had come from mediators to restart discussions with the US government. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is treading a difficult route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be acting from a position of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that concluded with the American leader claiming the facilities had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries exercised their privilege to reinstate international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Representatives stated repeatedly they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives stated the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if talks restart.

Trump in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but privately Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his speech to the forum, designed to portray the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be settled by armed force. He stated the assaults began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making confidence hard to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Final Answer

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the European states that had repeatedly sought to enforce their demands during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and continues the primary answer to settle disputes, but its requirements, regulations and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a response in the same approach."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, continues to exist. The installations and machinery, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the country in the face of this attack."