🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy presents a flawed view of the European Union. The document asserts that open-border policies and what it terms "woke" agendas pose an existential threat to European civilization. Yet, this perspective rests on a fundamental misinterpretation of the reality. The actual danger facing the EU is not cultural but economic and technological backwardness.

The Stark Growth Gap Separating the US and Europe

The data reveal a stark contrast. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by eighty-seven percent, compared to a mere thirteen and a half percent increase for the European Union. During this period, EU GDP per capita fell from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than major EU nations like Italy and France.

Today, roughly half of the global top fifty tech companies are American, while only four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Question

This widening economic gap stems from superior productivity growth in the United States, fueled by breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The scene of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly American. Over the past fifty years, hundreds of American startups have grown into enterprises valued at over $10bn, versus only fourteen in the European continent.

This gap raises a vital question: In the race for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, what is the EU positioned? Most analysts agree it is essentially a contest between two involving the US and China, with European nations entering at a significant handicap.

Root Causes of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several major factors account for this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a much more robust and more dynamic network for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, a factor that caps the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided regulation hinder European business. A US startup can introduce a product under one set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The EU, despite a larger population size, is divided among twenty-seven separate regimes, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically met with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has eroded its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, one can find reasons for hope. European leaders are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have begun to advance substantial change. Notable reports on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the need for sweeping changes.

With the right incentives and rule changes, Europe's strengths could support far greater levels of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses significant advantages: high-quality human capital, excellent education systems, and premier labs. Alongside a large internal market and high savings rates, these elements have the potential to unleash a surge of venture creation.

Crucially, even if Europe does not take the lead in developing next-generation technologies, it can still significantly increase productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a decisive moment. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's slide in innovation has been gradual. But, if it fails to take bold steps to address its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a sudden and irreversible decline in global economic relevance.